Nath Knits

and should probably be doing something else.

Happy new year! – Day five-months-and-a-bit

2 Comments

This is blooming in my back yard, as I type. I’m guessing it’s some kind of cherry.

It’s only been the new year for 10 days.  I’m the worst blogger ever.

The kids are back at school this week, after a fortnight break.  Plus one PD day on Monday (or, as they call them here, an Inset Day).  That extra day, for some reason, made the break seem really long.  Anyway, it was a good break, with periods of intense doing-nothing-ness punctuated with periods of intense-doing-cool-stuff and periods of intense-eating-too-much-butter.

What a bunch of freaks.

Christmas was quiet.  It was just us, though we did manage a few Skype/Facetime sessions with family back in Ottawa and Montreal.  We took a walk to the park (it was a pretty nice day).  Listened to the Queen’s speech.  Watched Doctor Who (is it me, or did that episode make no damn sense??).  Oh, and what I’m hoping will become a yearly tradition, there was the hanging of the Christmas Sweatpants on the mantel.

Note the tacky-yet-endearing fibre-optic tree that came with the house.

I didn’t have the presence of mind to bring stockings with us, and I wasn’t going to buy any, so Craig had the great idea of using a pair of way-too-large sweatpants that I had gotten earlier in the month from a well-meaning relative and knotting the bottoms.  It was surprisingly effective.

Highlights from the break include a trip to Edinburgh (which will get its own post. Hopefully before I forget what we did), a trip to Oxford to meet the Orchard family, (note my use of the Oxford comma just now, in honour of our trip, and because it’s just better, dammit) and a trip on the Emirates Airline cable car, whose actual usefulness is up for debate.  Also, museums, four performances of Treasure Island in one weekend for Zebula, and lots of knitting (also in its own post.  Promises, promises)

Complement to a equivalent picture Tricia posted.  Great photobomb!

Meeting the Orchards in Oxford was fun, both because they’re lovely people, and because the city itself is wonderful.  I’d love to go back and spend more time there.  We met for lunch, and then quickly saw Christ Church, including the cathedral and the Great Hall.  We also visited a tiny fraction of the Ashmolean Museum (which wins for best museum name) before it was time to go.  Oxford is a fairly short (an hour’s train ride from London) distance away, so we’ll probably go back.

I can’t help but feel I might have done better in University if this is where I ate every day.

Another shot of an impressive ceiling.

The last photobomb was cuter.

Old graffiti. This was nailed into a door at Christ Church to protest then Prime Minister Robert Peel in the 1840s. I was kind of hoping for a better story.

Is it me, or does this building look like it’s leaning forward?

The Emirates Airlines cable was something the kids had been wanting to do for a while.  The cable itself was planned by the Transport for London, but underwritten in large part by Emirates Airlines.  Its existence is a mystery.  There’s some information about it here, if you’re curious. But basically, it just seems to be there to show off.  There are only 4 regular commuters that use it.  It’s cool for tourists, but it doesn’t really take you anywhere that interesting.  And, of course, its construction went over budget.  Anyway, since the best part of taking the cable cars is getting a good view of the city, I kept waiting for a sunny day to do it, which is optimistic around here this time of year.  The day started out sunny, but it got cloudy and windier as our trip across happened.  Being 90 m above the Thames on a cable made me a little nervous, but the view was great, and the kids loved it.

The O2 centre on the left, and the Docklands. You can see the Gherkin around the upper left if you squint.

So high! Note the complete absence of passengers in the car we’re about to cross. I think, while we were airborne, that there were maybe 8 people traveling, total.

I started work at my volunteer job this week.  I work at the Queen’s House.  It was a good first day, and I got to talk to quite a few people even though, since it was the first Wednesday after Christmas Break, it was pretty quiet.  My favourite was a retired taxi driver who was finally getting around to visiting the London landmarks he’d driven people to for years but never managed to visit himself.  I’m looking forward to next week.  Also, there’s a lady in my choir who started this project and asked me if I’d like to volunteer with data entry.  So I should be doing that one day a week as well, starting in the next couple of weeks.

While the weather has been pleasant here (highs between 7 and 12 degrees), I miss winter in Canada.  And they’re having a doozy this year!  We’re expecting ‘arctic winds’ here in the next week.  We might even have a hard frost!!

I can’t believe I only noticed this yesterday, since I go to Trafalgar Square fairly often. But it’s the Canadian Embassy! In the same block as the Serious Fraud Agency.  Make your own conclusions.

Next up, Edinburgh!  (Seriously, if I don’t post anything in the next couple of days, send me scathing emails and comments of protest!)

(More pictures than common sense here (for December) and here (for January))

Advertisements

Author: nathknits

Mom, knitter, IT nerd, trying to make it all run smoothly.

2 thoughts on “Happy new year! – Day five-months-and-a-bit

  1. That house is not leaning forward; it is intentionally designed that way. Here is what I learned during a tour of Braunschweig (which has lots of this style of houses): The side walls are supporting walls, and for stability regions should be only one floor. To connect them, on each next floor you have to put them either one thickness in or one thickness out. But thickness out is much better because then you get more floor space for less land that you most own (and get taxed on.)

    Love the pictures!

  2. Yes, but even given that architectural feature, the house looked like it was tilted forward, like the front had sunken. The picture didn’t convey that as well as I wanted. If you looked at it from the front, the sides didn’t look like the house was leaning sideways. Given its age, it’s understandable!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s